Apple M5 Pro 和 M5 Max CPU 分析 - M5 Max 比 M4 Max 快不了多少ⓘ AppleApple 推出了新的 M5 Pro 和 M5 Max 芯片，采用了不同的方法，包括磁贴和新的超级内核。我们测试并分析了新款 M5 Pro/Max CPU 的性能和效率。新款 M5 Pro 的用户可以非常高兴，但新款 M5 Max 的结果却有点令人唏嘘。Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 03/10/2026 🇺🇸 🇳🇱 ...
🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇸🇪 🇹🇷 🇵🇱 🇭🇺 🇩🇪 AI ARM Apple Laptop / Notebook MacBook macOS
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types ← exclude selected tags
Apple 在 iPad Pro 中推出新的 M5-SoC 几个月后 iPad Pro和入门级 MacBook Pro 14现在，我们在更昂贵的 MacBook Pro 机型中看到了功能更强大的 M5 Pro 和 M5 Max 芯片。在本文中，我们将仔细分析新 CPU 的性能，有些用户会非常满意，但有些用户可能会感到失望。我们将在单独的 GPU 分析中讨论新的 M5 Pro 和 M5 Max GPU，当然，你也可以阅读我们对新 MacBook Pro 机型的评测：
Apple MacBook Pro 16 评论（M5 Pro、20 核 GPU、64 GB 内存）Apple MacBook Pro 14 评测（M5 Max，40 核 GPU，128 GB 内存）Apple M5 Pro 和 M5 Max GPU 分析（即将发布）
概述 - M5 Pro 和 M5 Max 使用相同的 CPU新的 M5 Pro 和 M5 Max 芯片仍采用 3 纳米工艺（第三代）制造，但Apple 现在采用了另一种方法。Apple 现在不再采用单片机设计，而是使用两片芯片（基本上是 CPU 和 GPU）并将它们组合在一起。这意味着 M5 Pro（或较慢的 15 核版本）和 M5 Max 的 18 核 CPU 部分是相同的，而 GPU 部分则不同。同样，也有不同的型号：基础版 M5 Pro 拥有 15 个 CPU 内核（5/6 个超级内核、10/12 个性能内核）以及完整的 18 内核版本，而 M5 Max 则始终拥有全部 18 个内核。
Apple M5 系列概述
Apple 包括 6 个主频高达 4.608 GHz 的超级内核，这些内核在普通的 M5-SoC 中已经很熟悉了，当时它们仍被称为性能内核。它们针对最高单核性能进行了优化，而新的高性能内核主频高达 4.38 GHz，针对多线程性能进行了优化。系统本身称它们为 M 核心，从性能角度看，它们介于新的超级核心（以前的性能核心）和 M5 SoC 的效率核心之间。
在我们的测试中，CPU 的最大功耗为 75 瓦，但无论是 MacBook Pro 14 还是 MacBook Pro 16 都无法保持这一数值。较小的 14 英寸机型在高功率模式下能保持 50 瓦，而 16 英寸 MacBook Pro 则能保持 62 瓦。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
测试系统 - MacBook Pro 14 和 16尽管情况并不理想，我们还是使用了两款全新 MacBook Pro 进行测试。我们的 MacBook Pro 16配备的是 18 核版 M5 Pro（64 GB LPDDR5x-9600 内存），而较小的 14 英寸版 较小的 14 英寸版本则配备了 M5 Max（128 GB LPDDR5x-9600 内存）。虽然 MBP 16 的测试非常简单，但较小的 14 英寸机型却被 M5 Max 压得喘不过气来，我们很难获得一致的基准测试成绩。请参阅 我们的评论更多信息（即将发布）。我们将尽快拿到配备 M5 Max 的 MacBook Pro 16，并添加测试结果。
MacBook Pro 14 M5 MaxMacBook Pro 16 M5 Pro
测试程序为了在不同处理器之间进行有意义的比较，我们除了在合成基准测试中考察纯性能外，还考察了功耗，并据此确定效率。
功耗测量始终在外部显示器上进行，以消除不同内部显示器的影响因素。不过，我们在这里测量的是系统的总体功耗，而不仅仅是比较纯粹的 TDP 值。
单核性能与效率不出所料，新款 M5 Pro 和 M5 Max CPU 的单核性能与我们已经从 MacBook Pro 14 和新款 MacBook Air 的基本 M5 SoC 中了解到的相同。它们提供了目前所能获得的最佳单核性能，甚至在 Cinebench 2024 中也将远远落后于新的骁龙 X2（甚至比 M4 代慢），但如果参考分数属实，则在 Geekbench 中会更接近。与 M4 代相比，新 M5 芯片的优势为 11-12%。
Performance rating: Percent | Cinebench 2024: CPU Single Core | Geekbench 6.7: Single-Core Performance rating
Apple M5 10-CoreApple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5
99.8 pt Apple M5 MaxApple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max
99.7 pt Apple M5 Pro 18-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro
99.6 pt Apple M5 10-CoreApple MacBook Air 15 M5
98 pt Apple M4 Max 16-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max
89.1 pt Apple M4 Pro 14-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
88.6 pt Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme X2E-96-100Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme X2E-96-100 Reference Scores
87.5 pt Intel Core Ultra X9 388HAsus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA
67.2 pt Intel Core Ultra 9 285HAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
65.6 pt Intel Core Ultra 9 285HMSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG
65.2 pt Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100
64.3 pt Intel Core Ultra 7 268VMicrosoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake
64.1 pt Intel Core Ultra 9 285HAsus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA
63.7 pt AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W
63.5 pt AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA
63.3 pt Intel Core Ultra 5 338HHonor MagicBook Pro 14 2026
63.2 pt Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon
63.1 pt Intel Core Ultra 7 255HHonor MagicBook Art 14 2025
61.9 pt AMD Ryzen AI 7 350Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10
61.6 pt AMD Ryzen AI 9 465Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA
61.4 pt Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core
Apple M5 Pro 18-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro
201 Points Apple M5 10-CoreApple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5
200 Points Apple M5 MaxApple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max
200 Points Apple M5 10-CoreApple MacBook Air 15 M5
199 Points Apple M4 Pro 14-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
178 Points Apple M4 Max 16-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max
178 Points Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme X2E-96-100Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme X2E-96-100 Reference Scores
162 Points Intel Core Ultra X9 388HAsus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA
129.8 Points Intel Core Ultra 9 285HAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
128 Points Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100
127 Points Intel Core Ultra 9 285HAsus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA
127 Points Intel Core Ultra 9 285HMSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG
127 Points Intel Core Ultra 7 268VMicrosoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake
124.9 Points Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon
123 Points Intel Core Ultra 5 338HHonor MagicBook Pro 14 2026
122.3 Points Intel Core Ultra 7 255HHonor MagicBook Art 14 2025
119 Points AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W
116.8 Points AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA
116.4 Points AMD Ryzen AI 7 350Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10
115.2 Points AMD Ryzen AI 9 465Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA
115 Points Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core
Apple M5 10-CoreApple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5
4326 Points Apple M5 MaxApple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max
4322 Points Apple M5 Pro 18-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro
4295 Points Apple M5 10-CoreApple MacBook Air 15 M5
4195 Points Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme X2E-96-100Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme X2E-96-100 Reference Scores
4080 Points Apple M4 Max 16-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max
3880 Points Apple M4 Pro 14-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
3836 Points Intel Core Ultra X9 388HAsus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA
3020 Points AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W
2978 Points AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA
2975 Points Intel Core Ultra 9 285HAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
2923 Points Intel Core Ultra 9 285HMSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG
2912 Points Intel Core Ultra 7 268VMicrosoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake
2855 Points AMD Ryzen AI 7 350Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10
2854 Points Intel Core Ultra 5 338HHonor MagicBook Pro 14 2026
2840 Points Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100
2834 Points AMD Ryzen AI 9 465Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA
2834 Points Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon
2813 Points Intel Core Ultra 7 255HHonor MagicBook Art 14 2025
2797 Points Intel Core Ultra 9 285HAsus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA
2781 Points Performance rating: Percent | Cinebench 2024: CPU Single Core | Geekbench 6.7: Single-Core
如果我们看一下 Cinebench 2024 运行时的效率，我们必须考虑到，与入门级 Macbook Pro 14 或 MacBook Air 相比，M5 Pro 和 M5 Max 是更大的芯片，内核更多，内存也更大。因此，虽然效率有所下降，但仍远远领先于其他芯片制造商。效率大致与旧款 M4 Pro 14 核心相当。我们已经迫不及待地想看到新的骁龙 X2 系列的效率结果，而英特尔和 AMD 则远远落在后面。
Power Consumption: Cinebench 2024 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor | Cinebench 2024 Single Power (external Monitor) Power Consumption / Cinebench 2024 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Apple M5 10-CoreApple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5
13.1 Points per Watt Apple M5 10-CoreApple MacBook Air 15 M5
12.8 Points per Watt Apple M5 Pro 18-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro
9.57 Points per Watt Apple M4 Pro 14-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
9.52 Points per Watt Apple M5 MaxApple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max
9.13 Points per Watt Apple M4 Max 16-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max
8.24 Points per Watt Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100
6.32 Points per Watt Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon
5.86 Points per Watt Intel Core Ultra 7 268VMicrosoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake
5.68 Points per Watt Intel Core Ultra 5 338HHonor MagicBook Pro 14 2026
5.29 Points per Watt Intel Core Ultra X9 388HAsus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA
5.17 Points per Watt AMD Ryzen AI 9 465Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA
4.39 Points per Watt AMD Ryzen AI 7 350Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10
4.04 Points per Watt Intel Core Ultra 9 285HAsus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA
3.9 Points per Watt Intel Core Ultra 7 255HHonor MagicBook Art 14 2025
3.83 Points per Watt Intel Core Ultra 9 285HMSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG
3.76 Points per Watt AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA
2.94 Points per Watt AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W
2.62 Points per Watt Intel Core Ultra 9 285HAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
2.34 Points per Watt Power Consumption / Cinebench 2024 Single Power (external Monitor)
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
54.8 (40.6min, 46.7P1 - 72.9max) Watt * AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W
44.6 (42min, 42.4P1 - 70.6max) Watt * AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA
39.6 (36.9min, 37.7P1 - 64.5max) Watt * Intel Core Ultra 9 285HMSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG
33.8 (28.9min, 30.9P1 - 84.6max) Watt * Intel Core Ultra 9 285HAsus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA
32.6 (28.5min, 29.8P1 - 46.5max) Watt * Intel Core Ultra 7 255HHonor MagicBook Art 14 2025
31.1 (25.7min, 27.2P1 - 39.8max) Watt * AMD Ryzen AI 7 350Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10
28.5 (23.6min, 26.4P1 - 54max) Watt * AMD Ryzen AI 9 465Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA
26.2 (24.2min, 25P1 - 47.1max) Watt * AMD Ryzen AI 9 465Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA
26.2 (24.2min, 25P1 - 47.1max) Watt * Intel Core Ultra X9 388HAsus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA
25.1 (21.9min, 22.6P1 - 37.3max) Watt * Intel Core Ultra 5 338HHonor MagicBook Pro 14 2026
23.1 (17.4min, 18P1 - 39.6max) Watt * Intel Core Ultra 7 268VMicrosoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake
22 (18.9min, 19.5P1 - 41.3max) Watt * Apple M5 MaxApple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max
21.9 (17.9min, 20.4P1 - 26.5max) Watt * Apple M4 Max 16-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max
21.6 (19.9min, 20.1P1 - 23.2max) Watt * Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon
21 (17.4min, 18.3P1 - 28.2max) Watt * Apple M5 Pro 18-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro
21 (18.8min, 20P1 - 23.3max) Watt * Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100
20.1 (13.1min, 17.2P1 - 34max) Watt * Apple M4 Pro 14-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
18.7 (14.2min, 17.5P1 - 20.5max) Watt * Apple M5 10-CoreApple MacBook Air 15 M5
15.6 (13.9min, 14.6P1 - 20.2max) Watt * Apple M5 10-CoreApple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5
15.3 (14.3min, 14.4P1 - 18.8max) Watt * Power Consumption: Cinebench 2024 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor | Cinebench 2024 Single Power (external Monitor) * ... smaller is better
多核性能与效率新款 M5 Pro 和 M5 Max 也具有良好的多核性能，但在 Cinebench 2024（对 CPU 施加几分钟的压力）测试中，它们的速度并不比之前的 M4 Max CPU 快。虽然这对 M5 Pro 型号来说是一个重大改进（比 M4 Pro 快近 20%），但对 M5 Max 来说却非常令人失望。
另一方面，Geekbench 的测试结果显示，M5 Max 的性能比旧款 M4 Max 提升了 10-14%，但请记住，Geekbench 只在很短的时间内对 CPU 施加压力，对持续性能没有任何影响。新的骁龙 X2 Elite 再次与Apple 的新芯片相当接近。
Performance rating: Percent | Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core Performance rating
Apple M5 Pro 18-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro
98.3 pt Apple M5 MaxApple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max
94.2 pt Apple M4 Max 16-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max
87.3 pt Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme X2E-96-100Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme X2E-96-100 Reference Scores
82.3 pt Apple M4 Pro 14-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
75.1 pt AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W
71.3 pt AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA
68.6 pt Apple M5 10-CoreApple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5
55.7 pt Intel Core Ultra X9 388HAsus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA
55 pt Intel Core Ultra 9 285HAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
54.7 pt Intel Core Ultra 9 285HMSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG
50.5 pt Apple M5 10-CoreApple MacBook Air 15 M5
49.4 pt Intel Core Ultra 5 338HHonor MagicBook Pro 14 2026
45.3 pt Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon
45.2 pt AMD Ryzen AI 9 465Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA
45.1 pt Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100
45.1 pt AMD Ryzen AI 7 350Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10
44.6 pt Intel Core Ultra 9 285HAsus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA
42.1 pt Intel Core Ultra 7 255HHonor MagicBook Art 14 2025
41.8 pt Intel Core Ultra 7 268VMicrosoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake
32.5 pt Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core
Apple M5 Pro 18-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro
2347 Points Apple M5 MaxApple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max
2073 Points Apple M4 Max 16-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max
2069 Points Apple M4 Max 16-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max
2015 Points Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme X2E-96-100Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme X2E-96-100 Reference Scores
1988 Points Apple M4 Pro 14-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
1729 Points AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA
1673 Points AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W
1648 Points Intel Core Ultra 9 285HAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
1194 Points Apple M5 10-CoreApple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5
1172 Points Intel Core Ultra X9 388HAsus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA
1172 Points Intel Core Ultra 9 285HMSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG
991 Points AMD Ryzen AI 7 350Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10
973 Points Intel Core Ultra 5 338HHonor MagicBook Pro 14 2026
968 Points Apple M5 10-CoreApple MacBook Air 15 M5
962 Points AMD Ryzen AI 9 465Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA
953 Points Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon
926 Points Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100
866 Points Intel Core Ultra 7 255HHonor MagicBook Art 14 2025
810 Points Intel Core Ultra 9 285HAsus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA
740 Points Intel Core Ultra 7 268VMicrosoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake
619 Points Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core
Apple M5 MaxApple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max
29415 Points Apple M5 Pro 18-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro
28436 Points Apple M4 Max 16-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max
25760 Points Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme X2E-96-100Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme X2E-96-100 Reference Scores
23491 Points Apple M4 Pro 14-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
22509 Points AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W
21269 Points AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA
19364 Points Apple M5 10-CoreApple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5
18054 Points Intel Core Ultra X9 388HAsus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA
17694 Points Intel Core Ultra 9 285HMSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG
17262 Points Intel Core Ultra 9 285HAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
17207 Points Apple M5 10-CoreApple MacBook Air 15 M5
16995 Points Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100
15665 Points Intel Core Ultra 9 285HAsus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA
15476 Points Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon
14998 Points AMD Ryzen AI 9 465Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA
14562 Points Intel Core Ultra 5 338HHonor MagicBook Pro 14 2026
14499 Points Intel Core Ultra 7 255HHonor MagicBook Art 14 2025
14454 Points AMD Ryzen AI 7 350Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10
14028 Points Intel Core Ultra 7 268VMicrosoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake
11388 Points Performance rating: Percent | Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core
与 M4 代相比，我们的能效测量结果也没有显示出巨大的改进。有趣的是，在我们的初步测试中，较小的 MacBook Pro 14 中的 M5 Max 比 MacBook Pro 16 中的 M5 Pro 效率更高一些。M5 Pro 的效率与旧款 M4 Pro 相当，但整体性能要高得多。
Power Consumption: Cinebench 2024 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor | Cinebench 2024 Multi Power (external Monitor) Power Consumption / Cinebench 2024 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Apple M5 10-CoreApple MacBook Air 15 M5
34.9 Points per Watt Apple M5 10-CoreApple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5
27.5 Points per Watt Apple M5 MaxApple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max
24.6 Points per Watt Apple M5 Pro 18-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro
23 Points per Watt Apple M4 Max 16-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max
22.4 Points per Watt Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100
22.1 Points per Watt Apple M4 Pro 14-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
20.2 Points per Watt Intel Core Ultra 9 285HMSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG
19.1 Points per Watt Intel Core Ultra 9 285HAsus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA
18.5 Points per Watt Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon
17.1 Points per Watt AMD Ryzen AI 9 465Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA
16.8 Points per Watt Intel Core Ultra 7 255HHonor MagicBook Art 14 2025
16.7 Points per Watt Intel Core Ultra X9 388HAsus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA
16.2 Points per Watt AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA
15.1 Points per Watt Intel Core Ultra 7 268VMicrosoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake
15 Points per Watt AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W
14.7 Points per Watt Intel Core Ultra 5 338HHonor MagicBook Pro 14 2026
12.9 Points per Watt AMD Ryzen AI 7 350Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10
9.63 Points per Watt Intel Core Ultra 9 285HAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
9.19 Points per Watt Power Consumption / Cinebench 2024 Multi Power (external Monitor)
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX
129.9 (124.1min, 125.2P1 - 151.3max) Watt * AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W
112.4 (109.8min, 109.9P1 - 134.7max) Watt * AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA
111.1 (105.2min, 106.5P1 - 127.7max) Watt * Apple M5 Pro 18-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro
102 (82.3min, 87P1 - 123.5max) Watt * AMD Ryzen AI 7 350Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AKP G10
101 (88.3min, 91.5P1 - 104.3max) Watt * Apple M4 Max 16-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max
92.2 (85.6min, 87.1P1 - 105.4max) Watt * Apple M4 Pro 14-CoreApple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro
85.8 (77.5min, 77.7P1 - 89.6max) Watt * Apple M5 MaxApple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max
84.1 (64.7min, 66P1 - 96.5max) Watt * Intel Core Ultra 5 338HHonor MagicBook Pro 14 2026
74.8 (8.08min, 58.9P1 - 83.1max) Watt * Intel Core Ultra X9 388HAsus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA
72.2 (66min, 66.8P1 - 89.8max) Watt * AMD Ryzen AI 9 465Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA
56.7 (53.3min, 53.8P1 - 68.6max) Watt * AMD Ryzen AI 9 465Asus ZenBook S16 UM5606GA
56.7 (53.3min, 53.8P1 - 68.6max) Watt * Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon
54 (46.8min, 47.8P1 - 67.4max) Watt * Intel Core Ultra 9 285HMSI Prestige 16 AI Evo B2HMG
51.9 (42.9min, 43.4P1 - 102.8max) Watt * Intel Core Ultra 7 255HHonor MagicBook Art 14 2025
48.4 (44.2min, 44.5P1 - 64.9max) Watt * Apple M5 10-CoreApple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5
42.6 (39.1min, 39.6P1 - 52.8max) Watt * Intel Core Ultra 7 268VMicrosoft Surface Pro OLED Lunar Lake
41.3 (38.9min, 39.6P1 - 41.6max) Watt * Intel Core Ultra 9 285HAsus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA
40 (35.4min, 35.5P1 - 65.3max) Watt * Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 X1E-84-100
39.1 (35.6min, 36.4P1 - 61.3max) Watt * Apple M5 10-CoreApple MacBook Air 15 M5
27.6 (25.1min, 25.1P1 - 37max) Watt * Power Consumption: Cinebench 2024 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor | Cinebench 2024 Multi Power (external Monitor) * ... smaller is better
结论 - M5 Pro 的性能大幅提升，但 M5 Max 的速度并不比旧款 M4 Max 快多少我们对新款 M5 Pro 和 M5 Max CPU 的初步测试结果喜忧参半。Apple对于 M5 Pro 的用户来说，两款机型使用相同 CPU 的决定是个好消息，因为他们将获得很好的性能提升，而且 CPU 性能与旗舰机型 M5 Max 相同。但对于 M5 Max 的潜在客户来说，情况就不同了，因为新的 M5 Max CPU 其实并不比旧的 M5 Max 快多少。是的，单核性能更好（不出所料），但你可以花 1099 美元在 MacBook Air 上获得同样的单核性能。
从目前的情况来看，高通公司的新款骁龙 X2 Elite 系列可能会迎头赶上，至少根据我们的参考分数，在 CPU 性能方面是如此。显然，我们还需要等待评测机来验证这些分数，并仔细观察其性能。
我们将尽快更新本文，提供更多基准测试结果。如果您对基准测试有任何希望，请留言评论。
Add as a preferred source on Google
More articles related to this device#1 Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro (MacBook Pro 16 2026 Series), #2 MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro (MacBook Pro 16 2026 Series), #3 MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max (MacBook Pro 14 2026 Series)News•AppleMacBook Pro 14 M5 Max 虽有缺陷，但仍几乎无可匹敌 #3|News•AppleM5 Pro 和 M5 Max 在 PugetBench creator 基准测试中轻松击败 RTX 5090 #2|News•配备 M5 Pro 和 1 TB SSD 的 MacBook Pro 16 基本型号是一款出色的多媒体笔记本电脑 #2|News•AppleMacBook Pro 16 中的 M5 Max 比 MacBook Pro 14 快约 15 |News•AppleMacBook Pro 14 无法处理 M5 Max #3|News•Apple 试图掩盖 MacBook Pro 机型电源适配器不足的事实 #3|Review•M5 Max 性能不稳定，存在节流问题 -Apple MacBook Pro 14 评测 #3|News•主要缺点 Apple MacBook Neo 电池寿命因过度削减成本而受到影响 #2|Review•Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 评测 - M5 Pro 让最好的多媒体笔记本电脑之一更出色 #2|Review•Apple M5 Pro 和 M5 Max GPU 分析 - M5 Max GPU 与GeForce RTX 5070 相当，比 Strix Halo 更快 #2Related Articles
AppleM5 Pro 和 M5 Max 在 PugetBench creator 基准测试中轻松击败 RTX 5090
03/25/2026
M5 Max 性能不稳定，存在节流问题 -Apple MacBook Pro 14 评测
03/11/2026
M5 Pro 和 M5 Max MacBook Pro 系列上市，性能大有改进，基本存储容量增加一倍
03/04/2026
Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 2183 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013contact me via: LinkedInTranslator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 811124 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via: